Author name: Ian D. Ghrist

Due-on-Sale Clauses

Most attorneys are shocked and appalled when they find out that their clients have been doing business, sometimes for several decades, as sole proprietors. The attorney typically pleads with the client to register a corporate entity to do business under, typically a limited liability company or LLC. As many clients are real estate investors or

Due-on-Sale Clauses Read More »

Texas Tools for Recovering Assets on Behalf of Defrauded Investors

Financial Record Requests/Subpoenas: In my experience, the financial record request is one of the most powerful tools for finding assets on behalf of defrauded investors. Section 30.007 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that these requests are governed by Section 59.006 of the Texas Finance Code. In Texas Finance Code Section 59.006,

Texas Tools for Recovering Assets on Behalf of Defrauded Investors Read More »

Applying the Rule of Capture to Residential Subdivions in the DFW Area

Applying current Texas Oil and Gas Law to micro-tract owners in urban areas ripe for horizontal drilling is often like attempting to put a square peg into a round hole. The Law was written with vertical drills and large and small, but not micro-sized, rural tracts in mind. Inside large metropolitan areas where tracts often

Applying the Rule of Capture to Residential Subdivions in the DFW Area Read More »

House Bill 2590 (Continuation of Oil and Gas Leases After Foreclosure) Would Reward Wrongful Conduct

Virtually all mortgage loans are drafted to encumber the mineral estate with a lien. Lender consent is generally expressly required to lease the minerals. Despite this requirement, many operators, particularly in urban areas have become lax about obtaining subordination agreements. To solve the problem, Bill HB 2590 was promoted, which passed the Texas House and

House Bill 2590 (Continuation of Oil and Gas Leases After Foreclosure) Would Reward Wrongful Conduct Read More »

Contracts for Deed: Do the Volume-Dealer Penalties of Section 5.077(d) Have an “Anchoring” Requirement?

One bankruptcy court says yes. Here is an argument for the answer being no. Under Section 5.077(d), the volume-dealer penalties apply to “A seller who conducts two or more transactions in a 12-month period under this section . . . .” One bankruptcy court has interpreted this provision as meaning that the volume-dealer penalties apply

Contracts for Deed: Do the Volume-Dealer Penalties of Section 5.077(d) Have an “Anchoring” Requirement? Read More »